Skip to main content

C++ Exception Specifications

Introduction​

Exception specifications are a feature in C++ that allows developers to specify what exceptions a function might throw. They are part of C++'s error handling mechanism, providing a way to document and enforce constraints on what exceptions can propagate from functions. Understanding exception specifications helps write more robust and maintainable code, especially in large projects where error handling needs to be consistent and predictable.

In this tutorial, we'll explore:

  • What exception specifications are
  • How they evolved in different C++ standards
  • How to use the modern noexcept specifier
  • Best practices for exception specifications

Evolution of Exception Specifications in C++​

Exception specifications have gone through significant changes throughout C++'s history:

C++98/C++03: Dynamic Exception Specifications​

In older C++ standards, you could specify exactly which exceptions a function might throw:

cpp
// C++98/03 style (deprecated in C++11, removed in C++17)
void functionA() throw(std::out_of_range, std::logic_error);  // Can throw only these exceptions
void functionB() throw();  // Cannot throw any exceptions
void functionC();  // Can throw any exception

The compiler would generate code to check if a function threw an exception not in its specification, and if so, call std::unexpected().

C++11: Introduction of noexcept​

C++11 deprecated the dynamic exception specifications and introduced the noexcept specifier:

cpp
void functionA() noexcept;  // Will not throw exceptions
void functionB() noexcept(false);  // May throw exceptions
void functionC() noexcept(condition);  // Conditional noexcept

C++17: Removal of Dynamic Exception Specifications​

C++17 completely removed the dynamic exception specifications, leaving only noexcept as the mechanism for specifying exception behavior.

The noexcept Specifier​

The noexcept specifier indicates that a function will not throw exceptions. It can be used in two ways:

Simple noexcept Declaration​

cpp
void safeFunction() noexcept {
    // This function promises not to throw exceptions
    // If it does throw, std::terminate will be called
}

Conditional noexcept​

You can use an expression that evaluates to a boolean:

cpp
template <typename T>
void process(T value) noexcept(noexcept(T::operation())) {
    value.operation();  // Only noexcept if T::operation() is noexcept
}

Basic Examples of noexcept Usage​

Let's look at some simple examples to understand how noexcept works:

Example 1: Basic Usage​

cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <stdexcept>

void safeFunction() noexcept {
    std::cout << "This function is guaranteed not to throw exceptions" << std::endl;
}

void unsafeFunction() {
    throw std::runtime_error("An exception occurred");
}

void badNoexcept() noexcept {
    // This will call std::terminate if executed
    throw std::runtime_error("This will abort the program");
}

int main() {
    try {
        safeFunction();  // Works fine
        
        try {
            unsafeFunction();  // Will throw an exception
        } catch (const std::exception& e) {
            std::cout << "Caught exception: " << e.what() << std::endl;
        }
        
        // Uncomment to see program termination:
        // badNoexcept();  // Will terminate the program
    } catch (...) {
        std::cout << "Caught an unknown exception" << std::endl;
    }
    
    return 0;
}

Output:

This function is guaranteed not to throw exceptions
Caught exception: An exception occurred

Example 2: Checking If a Function is noexcept​

C++ provides a way to check if a function is declared as noexcept:

cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>

void func1() noexcept {}
void func2() {}

template <typename T>
void processValue(T value) noexcept(noexcept(T::process())) {
    value.process();
}

int main() {
    std::cout << "func1 is noexcept: " << noexcept(func1()) << std::endl;
    std::cout << "func2 is noexcept: " << noexcept(func2()) << std::endl;
    
    return 0;
}

Output:

func1 is noexcept: 1
func2 is noexcept: 0

Advanced Usage of noexcept​

Move Operations and noexcept​

One of the most important uses of noexcept is with move operations. The C++ standard library relies on noexcept move operations for optimizations:

cpp
class SafeResource {
private:
    int* data;
    
public:
    // Constructor
    SafeResource(int size) : data(new int[size]) {}
    
    // Destructor
    ~SafeResource() { delete[] data; }
    
    // Copy constructor - may throw
    SafeResource(const SafeResource& other) {
        data = new int[sizeof(other.data)/sizeof(int)];
        // Copy data...
    }
    
    // Move constructor - noexcept for optimization
    SafeResource(SafeResource&& other) noexcept 
        : data(other.data) {
        other.data = nullptr; // Prevent double deletion
    }
    
    // Move assignment - noexcept for optimization
    SafeResource& operator=(SafeResource&& other) noexcept {
        if (this != &other) {
            delete[] data;
            data = other.data;
            other.data = nullptr;
        }
        return *this;
    }
};

Conditional noexcept with Templates​

When writing template code, you often want to propagate the noexcept specification:

cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

template <typename T>
void process_data(std::vector<T>& data) noexcept(noexcept(T().process())) {
    for (auto& item : data) {
        item.process();
    }
}

struct SafeProcessor {
    void process() noexcept {
        std::cout << "Safe processing" << std::endl;
    }
};

struct UnsafeProcessor {
    void process() {
        std::cout << "Potentially throwing processing" << std::endl;
        // Might throw
    }
};

int main() {
    std::vector<SafeProcessor> safe_vec(5);
    std::vector<UnsafeProcessor> unsafe_vec(5);
    
    // This will be noexcept
    std::cout << "process_data(safe_vec) is noexcept: " 
              << noexcept(process_data(safe_vec)) << std::endl;
    
    // This will not be noexcept
    std::cout << "process_data(unsafe_vec) is noexcept: " 
              << noexcept(process_data(unsafe_vec)) << std::endl;
    
    return 0;
}

Output:

process_data(safe_vec) is noexcept: 1
process_data(unsafe_vec) is noexcept: 0

Real-World Application​

Let's explore a practical example where exception specifications become important:

cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <stdexcept>

// A simple logger class
class Logger {
private:
    std::string logFile;
    
public:
    Logger(const std::string& filename) : logFile(filename) {}
    
    // This operation should never fail once the logger is constructed
    void logMessage(const std::string& message) noexcept {
        try {
            // Attempt to log
            std::cout << "Logging to " << logFile << ": " << message << std::endl;
            // In a real application, we'd write to a file here
        } catch (...) {
            // Suppress all exceptions, as promised by noexcept
            std::cout << "Error occurred during logging, but suppressed due to noexcept" << std::endl;
        }
    }
    
    // This might fail, so we don't mark it noexcept
    void changeLogFile(const std::string& newFile) {
        if (newFile.empty()) {
            throw std::invalid_argument("Log filename cannot be empty");
        }
        logFile = newFile;
    }
};

// Application that uses exception specifications appropriately
class Application {
private:
    Logger logger;
    std::vector<std::string> data;
    
public:
    Application() : logger("app.log") {}
    
    // Critical error handler must not throw
    void handleCriticalError(const std::string& errorMsg) noexcept {
        logger.logMessage("CRITICAL ERROR: " + errorMsg);
        // Perform safe shutdown procedures
    }
    
    // Regular operations may throw
    void processInput(const std::string& input) {
        if (input.empty()) {
            throw std::invalid_argument("Input cannot be empty");
        }
        
        try {
            // Process the input...
            data.push_back(input);
            logger.logMessage("Processed input: " + input);
        } catch (const std::exception& e) {
            logger.logMessage("Error processing input: " + std::string(e.what()));
            throw; // Rethrow for caller to handle
        }
    }
};

int main() {
    Application app;
    
    try {
        app.processInput("Valid input");
        app.processInput("");  // Will throw
    } catch (const std::exception& e) {
        std::cout << "Main caught exception: " << e.what() << std::endl;
        app.handleCriticalError(e.what());  // This is guaranteed not to throw
    }
    
    return 0;
}

Output:

Logging to app.log: Processed input: Valid input
Main caught exception: Input cannot be empty
Logging to app.log: CRITICAL ERROR: Input cannot be empty

Explanation of the Real-World Example​

  1. The Logger::logMessage method is marked as noexcept because logging failures should be handled internally without propagating exceptions.
  2. Application::handleCriticalError is also noexcept because error handling code should be robust and not fail with exceptions.
  3. Regular processing methods like processInput are allowed to throw exceptions for normal error conditions.

This pattern is common in robust software design:

  • Core functionality and error handling paths are noexcept
  • Regular processing paths can throw exceptions for expected error conditions

Performance Considerations​

noexcept is not just a documentation tool; it can lead to performance optimizations:

  1. Standard Library Optimizations: Containers like std::vector can use more efficient algorithms when move operations are noexcept.

  2. Compiler Optimizations: When the compiler knows a function cannot throw, it may generate more efficient code:

    • Eliminating exception handling code
    • Avoiding stack unwinding preparations
    • Better inlining opportunities

Let's see how this works with a simple benchmark:

cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
#include <vector>

// Function that might throw
int regularFunction(int x) {
    if (x < 0) throw std::runtime_error("Negative value");
    return x * 2;
}

// Same function but noexcept
int noexceptFunction(int x) noexcept {
    return x * 2;  // We know x won't be negative in our test
}

int main() {
    constexpr int iterations = 10000000;
    std::vector<int> values(iterations, 5);  // All positive to avoid actual exceptions
    
    // Benchmark regular function
    auto start = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
    int sum1 = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
        sum1 += regularFunction(values[i]);
    }
    auto end = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
    auto regularTime = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::microseconds>(end - start).count();
    
    // Benchmark noexcept function
    start = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
    int sum2 = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
        sum2 += noexceptFunction(values[i]);
    }
    end = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
    auto noexceptTime = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::microseconds>(end - start).count();
    
    std::cout << "Regular function took: " << regularTime << " microseconds" << std::endl;
    std::cout << "Noexcept function took: " << noexceptTime << " microseconds" << std::endl;
    std::cout << "Performance improvement: " 
              << (regularTime - noexceptTime) * 100.0 / regularTime << "%" << std::endl;
    
    return 0;
}

Note: The exact performance improvements will vary based on compiler, optimization settings, and hardware.

Best Practices for Exception Specifications​

  1. Use noexcept for functions that should not throw:

    • Destructors (which are implicitly noexcept since C++11)
    • Move constructors and move assignment operators
    • Swap functions
    • Memory deallocation functions
    • Error handling functions

  2. Don't use noexcept indiscriminately:

    • Only use it when you can guarantee no exceptions
    • Consider error handling carefully

  3. Understand failure modes:

    • Remember that noexcept functions that throw will terminate the program
    • Sometimes it's better to handle exceptions internally than to mark a function noexcept

  4. Use conditional noexcept in templates:

    • Propagate exception specifications from component types

  5. Be careful with inheritance:

    • An override cannot throw more exceptions than the function it overrides
    • If a base class method is noexcept, all overrides must be noexcept too

Summary​

Exception specifications in C++ have evolved from the dynamic specifications in C++98/03 to the simpler and more effective noexcept specifier in modern C++. Understanding and properly using noexcept can lead to:

  • More robust code with clearer exception guarantees
  • Performance improvements in specific scenarios
  • Better integration with the C++ standard library
  • More maintainable error handling strategies

Remember that noexcept is a contract with the caller: if a noexcept function throws, the program will terminate. Use it judiciously, especially in critical code paths where exceptions would be particularly problematic.

Exercises​

  1. Modify a class to properly use noexcept for its move operations and measure performance improvements when used with standard containers.

  2. Implement a resource management class with proper exception specifications for its methods.

  3. Write a template function that conditionally propagates the noexcept specification from its template arguments.

  4. Design an error handling hierarchy that uses noexcept appropriately for different levels of error handling.

  5. Analyze an existing codebase and identify functions that should be marked noexcept.

Additional Resources​

Understanding exception specifications is an important step in mastering C++ error handling. With the knowledge from this guide, you can make more informed decisions about when and how to use noexcept in your code.


If you spot any mistakes on this website, please let me know at [email protected]. I’d greatly appreciate your feedback! :)